Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
Rear seat foot rest
|
|
silverchief |
03-02-2014 @ 10:46 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 524
Joined: Oct 2009
|
My 46 Super Deluxe sedan coupe has the foot rests described in the rear. No problem getting in the way of anything.
|
ken ct. |
02-25-2014 @ 4:30 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1513
Joined: Jan 2010
|
My very original 41 I had 20 yrs ago had one . Only on 2+4 dr. sedans and possibly only super deluxes had them?? ken ct.
|
Stroker |
02-24-2014 @ 4:31 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1460
Joined: Oct 2009
|
Methinks that we are discussing different kinds of footrests. Lincoln's, Cadillac's, Chrysler's, etc. had footrests that were mounted on pedestals behind the front seats. The Ford footrests were simply an angled panel under the rear portion of the front seats. Not really noticeable unless you were seated. So...if you simply opened the rear door and looked in, you would not see them. The "traditional" footrests take up quite a bit of floor space, and were generally only present on longer wheelbase luxury vehicles.
|
sukhoiswift |
02-24-2014 @ 3:40 PM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 2014
|
Our '41 Fordor has the foot rests. With the 4 door ,not a problem to enter or exit.
Bob
|
sukhoiswift |
02-24-2014 @ 3:39 PM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 2014
|
Our '41 Fordor has the foot rests. With the 4 door ,not a problem to enter or exit.
Bob
|
cliftford |
02-21-2014 @ 7:56 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 845
Joined: Jan 2014
|
Are you talking about the panel that is fastened to the back of the seat bottom at a 45 degree angle? If so my '48 sedan coupe has it.
|
Drbrown |
02-21-2014 @ 6:39 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 578
Joined: Nov 2013
|
I have a '47 Super Deluxe 5-passenger (long-door) Coupe and I don't see how one could put a USEFUL foot bar in one of these. As well, one would have to fold it forward out-of-the-way to get in and out, requiring even more space. Dan
|
flathead48 |
02-21-2014 @ 3:08 PM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 317
Joined: Dec 2009
|
I had a 47 2 door sedan that had foot rests. Never seen them in coupes or convertibles I think because of lack of rear floor space.
|
supereal |
02-21-2014 @ 12:52 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I don't recall any of the '41-'48 Fords having foot rests. The Club's wonderful 41-48 book doesn't mention them, and it is a very complete reference.
|
ceresco |
02-18-2014 @ 11:50 AM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Jan 2014
|
I have a 1947 Super Deluxe Coupe. I see some of the 1947's models like the Sedans had a rear seat footrest. Was this standard on some models or optional on all models etc.
|