Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
Reuse wood or buy new
|
|
49FH8 |
06-21-2012 @ 5:06 AM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Jul 2011
|
I am restoring a 1936 pickup. The cab blocks and wood on frame rails seem to be in pretty good shape. A few minor cracks but for the most part it's in good shape. Trying to do a correct restoration. Is it recommended to use new wood anyway?
|
trjford8 |
06-21-2012 @ 8:50 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 4242
Joined: Oct 2009
|
If you are doing a frame off restoration I would recommend using the new wood blocks.
|
supereal |
06-22-2012 @ 6:44 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
|
If you have the equipment and skill to reproduce the wood, that is the way to go. Even though the wood looks good, it is wood, after all, and if original, almost certainly has deteriorated. That said, be aware that replacing body mounts requires lots of shimming, etc, to get a good fit of doors, etc. Interior body wood was usually installed before the sheet metal, and is a challenge to replace, thanks to always rusted carriage bolts in inaccessible places. This is particularly true of windshield headers. I once spent several days on one of those to get the rotted one out, then make and fit a replacement.
|
37V8 |
06-22-2012 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Feb 2010
|
I'm having a 1937 1/2 ton stake truck restored. The cab wood blocks were shot and were replaced, but the wood risers on the frame rails were in good enough condition that they were repaired rather than being replaced. At least on our truck the frame risers were all joined with finger joints, and are still in good shape. There's a cabinet shop next door that did the work, and does all the woodwork for the restorer. The cabinet shop just replaced all the wooden framework for the body of a 1939 MG BA with Tickford body, so he's evidently quite capable.
|
49FH8 |
06-24-2012 @ 3:37 AM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Jul 2011
|
Thanks guys, sounds like new wood is best for the frame off restoration.
|