Early Ford V-8 Club Forum

EFV-8 Club Forum / General Ford Discussion / Parts books & vender catalogs

Reply to Discussion | New Discussion << previous || next >>

Posted By Discussion Topic: Parts books & vender catalogs -- page: 1 2     TomO 06-04-2012 @ 9:55 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 7264 Joined: Oct 2009 "If restored or reproduced it must duplicate the original, as near as possible, in appearance, form, fit, function, color, texture, etc" If the judges follow Mike's interpretation of the rules, the floor mats, trunk mats, fan belts, radiator hoses, voltage regulators, fuel pumps, dash knobs, most upholstery, most rubber seals, many mechanical parts and other reproduced parts would require point deduction, because they are not exactly like the original. Alan's interpretation would allow the better quality reproductions pass. I am not on the Judging Standards Committee, or a current judge, but I lean more towards Alan's interpretation than Mike's. The Club's books are the best reference material as to what is considered correct and they should be used as guides for a restoration and judging. So, Mike, when you are writing the book, you should stick to your definition of originality. Anything can be reproduced, but our Club cars are not the high dollar cars like a Classics, so we have to accept what is being reproduced or go into business to reproduce parts, like Dennis Carpenter and Bob Drake did. I am completely unhappy with the fit of the current floor-mats available, but there is no way that I could afford to reproduce one correct for a Ford, much less a Mercury, so I live with it, because it is better than nothing. It would be nice to say that we should not buy these inferior reproductions, when they are the only game in town, we have to. Tom kubes40 06-01-2012 @ 4:30 PM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3423 Joined: Oct 2009 Hi Richard, I don't mean to sound elitist. As a matter of record I do nearly all of my own work as I simply can't afford to pay another to do it for me. Also, not "my" rules but rather the rules of our club. Anyone can can compete for the awards. as it should be. As it IS. However, my argument remains not everyone should expect to win simply because they can't afford what's necessary to do so. I do think to have a car score high on the concourse, it can take the "average guy" (as you call) him out of the game. I do without a new car, big screen tv, etc. so I can have the award winning cars I desire (and produce. It all comes down to a matter of choice(s). I can't accept a guy receiving the same score as me if I went to the extra lengths to acquire the correct parts, do the extra research, etc. required to make my vehicles "correct". Should the fellow that can't or chooses not to "play" at this level be eligible for an award? Sure. And he is eligible. But NOT the same points simply because he can't find, can't afford or simply doesn't choose to make the requisite efforts required to get that top point car. C'mon, nothing is "even" in our society. Nor should it be. We can certainly lower the standards so everyone can feel good about himself easy enough. As a society, we've been doing that for many years now. Recall the "No child left behind" program for our nations schools? That worked out real well. Yep. Lots of kids graduated. Too bad the standards were set much lower then when my generation was being schooled. Yep, the kids can feel real good about themselves & graduating. Too bad, in reality, they did not get an education. 20% cannot read even though they received their "trophy" (diploma). Bottom line remains: (I am not quoting) The rules of our club dictate the car must be restored to the way it was when it was delivered to the first buyer. respectfully, Mike 51f1 06-01-2012 @ 2:28 PM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 573 Joined: Oct 2009 kubes40: You say, "It is not an excuse if you can't find and/or afford any given part. EVERYTHING is either available or can be produced. If it was made once, it can be made again. Sure, that can be costly. That is the "game" you, as a con=course participant choose." I understand what you are saying. I'm a rules guy too, but you sound a bit too elitist for me. Aren't you pricing most hobbyists out of the game if you hold hard and fast to your "rules?" If your opinion prevails, only rich guys will be able to compete for awards by having their cars restored by expensive restorers. The average individual will not be able to restore his vehicle to a completely original condition, because he has neither the money nor the resources. The average guy is lucky if he can afford what's available in the vendors' catalogs. And it's getting tougher everyday. If your opinion prevails, you will price the average guy out of the game. Is that what it's coming to? At that point, count me out. Richard kubes40 06-01-2012 @ 1:44 PM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3423 Joined: Oct 2009 Don, I agree with you completely. Most likely there will come a day when it is nearly impossible to restore a car to the degree I and others aspire to. There are only so many parts, so many guys willing to make the effort and investment... When and if that time comes about, perhaps that's when the club may want to review it's policies. Until then / while it remains possible to do a near perfect restoration, I feel we must abide by the current rules. I am known to be strict but honest. I only deduct if I am certain of the infraction. It has been my experience that for the most part the fellow's that do their own research and / or a large part of their restoration work are the most inclined to have a desire to realize where they may have over looked something. Those same guys go home happy, make the necessary changes and try again. Don Rogers 06-01-2012 @ 1:28 PM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 504 Joined: Oct 2009 Gentlemen, Here is what is written in the Jan 1, 2012 edition of Early Ford V-8 Club Judging Manual under General Policy: "The broad objective of EFV8CA restoration insofar as judging is concerned is to duplicate in every detail the vehicle as it left the factory assembly line and/or the Ford dealer showroom floor." If a car is judged properly by these guidelines today there should be no allowance for later improvements (even by Ford) that occur after the Model year time period. Examples would be 37 steering in a 35 Ford, glass bowl fuel pumps in 35 or 36 Fords. This also includes poorly made reproduction parts or parts where the vendors logo can be clearly seen. If it didn't have "J.C. Whitney" on the part when the car was made, it shouldn't have it on the part now. If these requirements are presently unobtainable, as some have indicated, then the existing judging rules have to be reviewed and changed if appropriate for the future. Perhaps words like "authentic" and "Dearborn Class" will become Obsolete!!!! kubes40 06-01-2012 @ 11:54 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3423 Joined: Oct 2009 In response to Barry: I appreciate an "insiders" view of what happened to the Ford parts and books. I am not surprised a bit but perhaps your shared experience will help others understand what happened in the past. As for as your opinion about YOU not deducting for an incorrect part... well, with all due respect,I hope you do not judge. The rules are very clear: The car is supposed to be restored to the way it was built and subsequently delivered to the first owner. By your stated opinion, then all glass bowl type fuel pumps are A-OK on pre 1941 Fords. And, if that's okay, what else? There are no exceptions within the club rules. I realize this is a "hot topic" but unless and until the club changes its rules, the only way to make a Dearbron award worth more than the cost of the plaque, is to make folks abide by (be judged by) the same criteria. bonusbuilt1950 06-01-2012 @ 8:13 AM reply profile send p.m. Member Posts: 49 Joined: Feb 2011 The advice on using a parts catalog closest to the year of manufacture is sound advice. Being a former Ford Parts manager for 30+ years, I understand Ford's thinking. Getting an original catalog is hard, as most dealers tossed the original when the revised ones were issued. Catalogs were issued 4 times a year for each line. Most catalogs found today are the condensed versions and have alot of mistakes and ommissions. Good example are the green bible, the 48-56 truck catalogs. Many parts were originally designed for a certain year and cataloged as such. Often, they found problems with the original, so they came up with a better design, or supercession. We used to recieve OSI books between major catalog revisions that would give the supercession and or interchange of part number. Also if a part went obsolete. This catalog is a big help and I think a good idea to have even now. I have a bunch from the 40's and 50's and use them often. We found many parts could be interchanged with others to repair a vehicle. WE'd find 2 different part numbers and compare them out of the box and they were identical. When restoring a vehicle these days, the odds of finding an original part instead of the superceded one is rare. Dealer used up the originals before ordering the supercession. No one wanted to get stuck with the old part number on the shelf. Often, the difference was very slight. I have to disagree on the concourse judging rules, if a part is correct as to the Ford catalog no matter an original or supercession, no points should be deducted. I would never go by the vendors remarks as a lot of time thier info is incorrect. If there is a blatant difference between an original and aftermarket/ repo part, then yes, deduct for it. Barry 50 F-1 kubes40 06-01-2012 @ 7:53 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3423 Joined: Oct 2009 In response to: What is wrong with the current reproduction upper radiator hoses for 1940 Fords? I haven't bought any in 15 years. Authentic 1940 Ford hoses did not have any markings on them. It is well documented that the markings did appear until early 1944. I would hazard a guess here and say that many venders (Drake comes to mind) copy service replacement parts. You know, the Green Bible theory. The part fits, it functions but is not necessarily correct. 40guy 06-01-2012 @ 7:28 AM reply profile send p.m. Member Posts: 270 Joined: Oct 2009 What is wrong with the current reproduction upper radiator hoses for 1940 Fords? I haven't bought any in 15 years. kubes40 06-01-2012 @ 7:10 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3423 Joined: Oct 2009 I am one of those guys that don't allow for the "best available" part, etc. There are hard rules about this. That being the car is deemed to be a "perfect" restoration when the judging begins. Any deviations from authentic result in a point loss. It is not an excuse if you can't find and / or afford any given part. EVERYTHING is either available or can be produced. If it was made once, it can be made again. Sure, that can be costly. That is the "game" you, as a con=course participant choose. If you apply the theory that "the best available part is "acceptable" the founding principles of our Club will vanish completely. Sooner or later all authentic (correct) parts will not be available unless someone makes them anew. Does that mean our concourse is filled with cars that all have "the best available" junk on them? At that point, count me out. I realize some judges look the other way and I am strongly against this practice. If we as judges KNOW the part is wrong or a poor reproduction, a point loss should be forthcoming. If not the new "A" cars will become in reality a bunch of "C" cars. Are we really wanting to get our concourse akin to the modern little leagues wherein they don't keep score so there are no losers and all the kids feel great? We know how that theory has worked on our society. Not for me, thanks. If we do subscribe to the aforementioned theory how about we just give all who enter the concourse a trophy right away. The savings in time and efforts would be great. Plus, everyone can go home and tell their friends they won. Me? I'd rather earn my award(s). Let's be completely honest here: We all do not play on the same field. Some have more talents and / or more play money. Regardless of the participants talents / monies, once on the concourse we all are SUPPOSED to play by the same rules. Fair is fair. There are touring classes, etc. for those that judging is not so important. By the way, I restore my cars to see what I am personally capable of accomplishing. Each one is a challenge that I welcome. Often it has been a strain on my knowledge level and / or play money. Still, I find a way. MY choice. I do not offer any excuses when I may have over looked something. By the way Alan, you did not make an enemy out of me. I do disagree with you this time (that rarely happens) but you still have my respect. This message was edited by kubes40 on 6-1-12 @ 7:12 AM

<< previous || next >>

PAGE: 1 2

NOTE: YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED USER AND BE LOGGED IN TO POST (and reply to) messages in this forum. If you are a first time user, please click the CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT in the masthead above to register and Log In. After that, all you do is LOG IN to enjoy using this site.

DISCLAIMER: The V-8 Club does no independent testing of any of the opinions, thoughts or suggestions presented in the website on the Forum, in the Tech Tips section, or any section. A reader should consider the website to be a forum wherein differing solutions to a particular set of circumstances may be discussed. Ultimately, the selection of an item for an individual's vehicle must be based upon the independent study of the vehicle owner in consultation with people in the hobby and restoration experts.

EFV-8 Club Forum Home | Back to Home Page | Contact the Webmaster

Copyright © 2009 - EFV-8.org
Powered by < CF FORUM > v.2.1