LOGIN
  • Post to the EFV-8 Forum
  • Post Classified Ads
  • Shop the Online Store
User Login

Not Registered Yet? Click Here to Sign Up!



(Forgot your Password?)
Remember me on this computer

Not registered yet?
REGISTER NOW!

Back to Home Page Show Forum Rules

Early Ford V-8 Club Forum

FORUM RULES: Users agree to these Rules when using Forum.

The site administrator reserves the right to change the terms and conditions of the user agreement without prior notice to the user. It is the responsibility of the user to regularly review the terms of this agreement.

The user agrees to the following terms:

  1. All information that you provide to us for your membership is correct.
  2. You will not use your membership to spam, harrass, or exploit other members in any way.
  3. Vulgar, Abusive, Racist and Sexist Language will not be tolerated.
  4. Commercial-type sales postings will not be allowed.
  5. No mass posting or flooding of the boards is allowed.
  6. No Advertising of parts or cars; no Ebay or business/commercial ads (please use the "Classified" for ads Wanted or For Sale).
  7. VIEWING MULTIPLE TOPICS ON SCREEN: You can choose to see more than 10 Topics at a time ... Log In and choose "Preferences" from the top bar on the Forum page. Scroll down and Change the "Default Topics Returned" parameter to 25 or 50, and save the changes. Since this setting is stored in your browser 'cookies' (if enabled), it seems to use that stored value even if you are not logged in. So, if you use a PC that you haven't logged into the forum from, the setting still seem to remain at the default.
  8. EXTERNAL PHOTO LINKS ON FORUM: You can still use external photo links in your posts on the new forum. They follow the rules of any link in that they have to have the URL link qualified down to the full image file name (example: .jpg). The links will open in a new browser window, the same as an uploaded image attached to a post. Since an image attachment to any post does not display inline with the post, the results are the same. You can use multiple external links within a post. This link is from photos on a site from Don Clink's 'Deuce@75' albums:

    http://donclink.com/deuce_75_1/images/dscn2950.jpg

    Using links from photo sites such as Photobucket can help in "size" issue with uploaded attachment files. For best viewing in web browsers, photos should be around the 800x600 pixel range, and probably not more than 1024x768. Most cameras today store HUGE jpg image files, as the default settings are in the 7, 8, 10, and 12Mb image sizes. The image files that are then attached are very large, and the browser can't display the full image size without using the scroll bars. Use the re-sizing functions of your photo editing software to reduce the image to 800x600, which reduces the file sixe and the image load time in the browser. Don uses Google's free Picassa3 software, which is an excellent photo management product. All of the photo albums of the Deuce, Grand National, and Auburn that are links on the NORG site were built using Picassa's web creation functions. And it's free? (THANKS to Don Clink for the info!)
  9. HOW DO I SHOW MY EMAIL ADDRESS ALONG WITH MY USERNAME? You can LogIn on the Forum, and select PREFERENCES. On this page Members can add optional information such as their City,State, Country; Occupation; Hobbies: list a Homepage; list AOL Instant Messanger Handle; Signature; "Make Email Address viewable to others;" and even change the number of Default Topics shown on a page. WHEN others click on your profile, they will see this information.

EFV-8 Club Forum / General Ford Discussion / clutch chatter

   Reply to this DiscussionReply to Discussion | Start new discussionNew Discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Discussion Topic: clutch chatter -- page: 1 2

Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts first

supereal
03-25-2011 @ 10:23 AM
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
          
While the "slingshot" does restrain the fore and aft movement of the engine and transmission, it doesn't dampen the twisting of these components on their horizontal axis as power is applied. A better solution would probably be a lateral extension of the motor mounts to provide increased leverage, particularly at the rear. Early rear mounts were identical to the front rubber "donuts", and were replaced by the rubber ring type in later models. All mount designs were tempered by the need to isolate engine vibrations, making rigidity a trade off. If there are better ideas, they haven't emerged to date.

okydoky
03-25-2011 @ 9:22 AM
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Jul 2010
          
Thanks guys for responding in such a timely manner. I would like some more input on the so-called slingshot. I am intrigued with this idea but would like to hear from some folks with some experience with this device before I pay somebody to fabricate it for me.

supereal
03-20-2011 @ 10:18 AM
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
          
One approach that I didn't include in my previous post is that sometimes the chatter, particularly if severe, can be reduced by placing the car on sturdy stands with all four wheels off the ground, then loosening the bolts that attach the transmission to the engine. After starting the engine and placing the transmission in gear, let it run a bit, work the clutch a few times, then cinch down the bolts. This will often reduce any mismatch between the center line of the transmission and the pilot bearing in the flywheel. Just be very careful when working under a car on stands, particularly when it is running. I prefer to do it with the car on a hoist in the shop, of course.

Stroker
03-19-2011 @ 8:09 PM
Senior
Posts: 1460
Joined: Oct 2009
          
When I first started driving the family's 38 Station Wagon in 1954, I just sort of learned to deal with it by experimenting with throttle and clutch. The problem was much worse in reverse, but could be tamed by appropriate engagement. At this point, the car had lost its' anti-chatter rods due to several engine change-outs. I drove this car through college, until the mid-60's, and didn't drive it again until the late 70's, after I had replaced all the motor mounts, new motor, clutch, flywheel, and installed a pair of NOS anti-chatter rods. Guess what?

I will say that the anti-chatter rods do look nice, and they fill the holes in the bell housing very
appropriately. My biggest problem was finding those counter-sunk square-drive bolts for the frame end. In my latest refurbishing of the "o'l family bus", I plan on leaving the "rods", and teaching the grandchildren how to properly engage a really fussy clutch...It will be good for them.



oldford2
03-19-2011 @ 6:57 PM
Member
Posts: 275
Joined: Oct 2009
          
When we first got our mostly original 43,000 mile 46 sedan the clutch chattered. So, did all the things to lessen the chatter. New front and rear motor mounts, rear spring shackles,added chatter rods, etc., etc..
I noticed when my wife drove it, it did not chatter much. I think she was slipping the clutch. Anyway, we have learned to operate the clutch now to minimize to zero chatter. So, part of reducing chatter is learning driver clutch engagement. John

This message was edited by oldford2 on 3-19-11 @ 6:57 PM

42wagon
03-19-2011 @ 12:54 PM
Senior
Posts: 586
Joined: Oct 2009
          
supereal
That gadget you supplied a sketch of is known around here as "the slingshot". I have one that came on my wagon. Don't know if it was an aftermarket accessory or something a local garage made up. Doesn't seem to do much good but is a great conversation starter.
42 wagon

supereal
03-19-2011 @ 10:53 AM
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
          
I agree with 42. All of the old Fords I've owned had some clutch chatter, some more than others. The Ford drive line went basically unchanged from the beginning thru 1948, mostly due to Henry's rigid opposition to change. As said, the problem arises as the rear axle pushes forward on the torque tube, leaving the motor mounts to absorb the thrust. It is tempting to blame the clutch, itself, for the problem, but there are other factors to consider. The rear spring must be intact, with clips in place, and firmly attached to the crossmember. The spring shackles must have pins with little or no play. The rear hubs must be tight on the tapers. If you hear a "clunk" as you drive, check them. The u-joint housing must be tightened over the ball, with the cork seals in place. Lastly, the clutch release linkage and clutch housing bushings must be free of play. One end is attached to the frame, with the other end at the release shaft thru the bell housing. Any movement of the drive train is magnified by the linkage. The arm on the release shaft moves a fraction of the pedal travel, and as the engine moves on its mounts, this is translated into an irregular operation of the pressure plate, causing much of the "shudder". Lots of remedies have been tried. I've attached one such. None will remove all the problem, but you can reduce it to a tolerable level.

TomO
03-19-2011 @ 8:45 AM
Senior
Posts: 7257
Joined: Oct 2009
          
A fast idle or too much gas when engaging the clutch, will add to clutch chatter.

The idle should be between 450 RPM and 550 RPM, preferably at 450 RPM.

When starting out, let out on the clutch until the engine starts to slow down, then increase the amount of gas as you let the clutch out the rest of the way.



Tom

42wagon
03-19-2011 @ 4:10 AM
Senior
Posts: 586
Joined: Oct 2009
          
Clutch chatter is something that Henry's engineers never were able to entirely eliminate from our beloved old Ford's. At some point they determined that the anti-chatter rods were not the answer and stopped putting them in.

That said I don't believe you have addressed the heart of the problem. The problem seems to be caused by the drive train shifting back and forth when the car is first put in gear,I would check to see that your motor mounts are as tight as you can possibly get them . Also the bolts at the yoke that supports the end of the transmission. After that check all the connections between the rear axle and the frame. Is there play in your universal joint?

You may reduce the problem but I don't think it will ever totally go away.
Ted

51f1
03-18-2011 @ 10:32 PM
Senior
Posts: 573
Joined: Oct 2009
          
Perhaps as 37RAGTOPMAN says, it needs to wear-in a bit. I had some chatter on my restored truck. I have a like-new pressure plate, a resurfaced flywheel and a new disc and throw-out. After about 3,000 miles it has improved quite a bit. If it doesn't wear-in, you need to carefully check each component. The pressure plate could be adjusted improperly or the flywheel surface may not be true. You may have a bum disk. Check to be sure the transmission is lined-up properly with the engine.

Richard

<< previous || next >> 
PAGE: 1 2


NOTE: YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED USER AND BE LOGGED IN TO POST (and reply to) messages in this forum. If you are a first time user, please click the CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT in the masthead above to register and Log In. After that, all you do is LOG IN to enjoy using this site.

DISCLAIMER: The V-8 Club does no independent testing of any of the opinions, thoughts or suggestions presented in the website on the Forum, in the Tech Tips section, or any section. A reader should consider the website to be a forum wherein differing solutions to a particular set of circumstances may be discussed. Ultimately, the selection of an item for an individual's vehicle must be based upon the independent study of the vehicle owner in consultation with people in the hobby and restoration experts.


EFV-8 Club Forum Home | Back to Home Page | Contact the Webmaster

Copyright © 2009 - EFV-8.org
Powered by < CF FORUM > v.2.1