Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
1951 Rearend Ratio
-- page:
1
2
|
|
caretaker |
02-03-2010 @ 5:22 PM
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I have a 1951 V-8 with a H.D. 3 speed floor shift. Can anyone advise what would be the standard differential ratio on this truck. I was told that mine is a farm truck because the bed width is wider than a standard struck.
|
trjford8 |
02-03-2010 @ 8:41 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 4228
Joined: Oct 2009
|
The standard ratio was 3.92. I'm sure you could also order a lower ratio (4.27)if needed.
|
51f1 |
02-04-2010 @ 4:16 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 573
Joined: Oct 2009
|
As trjford8 states, the standard ratio was 3.92 and the optional ratio was 4.27. This applies to the F-1 pick-up only. You didn't say yours was an F-1. The 3-speed HD floor shift transmission was an option on the F-1 through the F-5. The Larger capacity trucks had different rear-end ratios. For example, the F-2 and F-3 had 4.11 and 4.857 ratios. I have never heard of a wider bed called a farm bed. It's not in any of the sales literature or books that I have. The F-1 bed is about 4 feet wide (to accomodate a sheet of plywood). Richard
This message was edited by 51f1 on 2-4-10 @ 4:21 AM
|
37RAGTOPMAN |
02-05-2010 @ 7:51 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1965
Joined: Oct 2009
|
hi caretaker I have a complete,drum to drum rear out of a M1 52 MERCURY PICK-UP [ same as 51 52 FORD F1,] had a 3 speed on the column,I do not know what ratio it is but more of a highway rear than what you have, IF INTERESTED let me know,located in MAINE, but I go to HERSEHY PA in the FALL AACA meet,if this helps 37RAGTOPMAN bythebaymaine@myfairpoint.net this MERCURY was converted to a modern drive train by a different person,and was a complete truck,also have the frontend with springs and drums,
|
supereal |
02-05-2010 @ 8:37 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
|
In most cases, changing the rear end ratio is accomplished by swapping the entire rear axle assembly with a junkyard unit when the driveline is the open type. Since few restored trucks actually haul anything but the driver, a lower ratio allows you to run at hiway speeds, instead of the usual fifty and under, with little loss of low speed power.
|
51f1 |
02-19-2010 @ 12:42 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 573
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I think Supereal meant a higher ratio (numerically lower). A lower ratio would result in a lower highway speed (mph).
Richard
|
supereal |
02-19-2010 @ 2:21 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
|
A low ratio would be 1-1, a higher ratio would be 1-2, etc, low referring to the result of dividing the number of teeth on the ring gear by those on the pinion. Thus a high ratio, 9-37, results in a gearing of 4-12 to 1, while a low ratio, such as 11-39, produces 3-55. I think the confusion results from the usual "high gearing" to "low gearing" useage, rather than the numerical ratio. A 3-55 gearing results in more turns of the axle per drive shaft revolution, and higher speed before you run out of revs.
|
37RAGTOPMAN |
03-03-2010 @ 6:55 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1965
Joined: Oct 2009
|
HI Caretaker Higher ratio [411-1] lower speed more power for steep hills and pulling loads lower ratio [ 354-1 ] higher speed on highways and less power on steep hills and you have to use lower gear in trans for steep hills, this is the way I understand it, I put a 354-1 in my 37 Cabriolet, and goes faster on the road, gets better gas miliage,and I really do not see any or much difference on hills, using the 85 hp engine, my 3 cents worth 37RAGTOPMAN IF YOU have a 4 speed with a granny gear you will have sort of the best of both worlds.if you had a high speed rear,low ratio 355 378 and like If you plan on carrying loads or pulling a trailer go with a 378 or so
|
supereal |
03-03-2010 @ 2:19 PM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 6819
Joined: Oct 2009
|
Most of the four speed transmissions were non-synchro, and offer few advantages, unless you plan to do some stump pulling. The ideal combination is a 3-78 rear with a 30% add-on overdrive, such as the Mitch*ll. It allows you to run a hiway speeds, yet retain plenty of power for traffic driving. I don't shift into OD much below 40-45, but I can run 65-70 when needed to keep up with traffic and not have some jerk trying to push me.
|
37RAGTOPMAN |
03-04-2010 @ 5:08 AM
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1965
Joined: Oct 2009
|
yes that is the ideal combo, IF you have the $2,000-$3,000 for the MITCH OVERDRIVE UNIT, I thought that the only gear in a 4 speed that was not a snycro was 1st, but that 1st does come in handy if you have a use for it,and it depends how much you drive the car or truck to go the extra $,for many different upgrades, I never had a problem shifting them, and then there are the 5 and 6 speed trans out there that could be installed as well just my 3 cents worth,37RAGTOPMAN
|