Early Ford V-8 Club Forum

EFV-8 Club Forum / 1940 Ford Discussion / rad grille cross & brace 01A 8145-B

Reply to Discussion | New Discussion << previous || next >>

Posted By Discussion Topic: rad grille cross & brace 01A 8145-B -- page: 1 2     deuce_roadster 02-03-2011 @ 10:30 PM reply profile send p.m. Member Posts: 284 Joined: Oct 2009 Mike, another question that will be easy for you. I have seen this part painted black on some non black cars and body color on other non black cars. Which is correct? I would think it should be body color, it was probably painted when the louvered sides got done. But that is only my guess. kubes40 02-04-2011 @ 6:03 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3394 Joined: Oct 2009 Yikes! This is actually not an easy one to answer. We need to go back to 1939 first. Anyway, here goes... In early 1939 the cross brace was bolted to the grille. We KNOW for a fact the brace was at that time painted black. In mid 1939, that brace began to be riveted to the grille and the painting requirement changed accordingly. That is, the brace (riveted) was to be painted with the grille, hence, body color. This too we know for fact. Now comes 1940. It only stands to reason as ALL braces were riveted to the grille in 1940, that all would be painted body color. After all, why go back to a more costly method (masking, etc)? While most braces were in fact body color and the engineering releases prove this to be the method to be employed, there remains a few factory photos that depict this brace black, differing from body color. As you see, no 'easy' answer. The released drawings definitely depict this brace to be body color. That is, painted with the grille. Do we discount the factory photos as 'staged' or??? That is for the judges to decide. Sorry... Hope this helps... Mike This message was edited by kubes40 on 2-5-11 @ 5:41 AM deuce_roadster 02-04-2011 @ 9:39 AM reply profile send p.m. Member Posts: 284 Joined: Oct 2009 Thanks for that history Mike, I appreciate your knowledge. That makes sense to me and as a bonus I think it looks better body color. I would think very few cars actually came from the factory with that part not body color. I am putting a grille together from all NOS Ford parts so I wanted to know now before I rivet the thing together. kubes40 02-04-2011 @ 11:08 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3394 Joined: Oct 2009 From a production standpoint it makes NO sense for that brace to be anything but body color. A friend of mine who had owned a body shop from the early '40s until the late 80's recalled them being body color. he also told me the front ends on 40 Fords were one of the worst to align. But hey, we KNEW that Stroker 02-05-2011 @ 4:34 PM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 1460 Joined: Oct 2009 Mike: From a "production standpoint"; why do late 30's cylinder head nuts and washers appear to be unpainted, when it would seem that the most logical point to paint an engine would be after it is assembled? Dan kubes40 02-06-2011 @ 5:55 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3394 Joined: Oct 2009 There was a type of 'mask' (for lack of a better term) placed over the intake and cylinder head areas prior to the engines being painted. Why Ford did it this way I have no clue. The fact remains they did - at least in 1940. alanwoodieman 02-11-2011 @ 7:26 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 868 Joined: Oct 2009 to throw fuel on the fire and for discussion, back in 1974 I bought a wrecked 40 sedan, wrecked in 1942 according to the liscense plates, it was hit real hard in the back and in the front, now when I disasembled the parts, the radiator cross brace was painted body color on the top and black underneath,apparently was painted black and then rivited to the rest of the grill and painted body color. When the first book was being worked on Benny Bootle and I had some discussions about that fact-wish I had kept those parts! kubes40 02-11-2011 @ 9:28 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3394 Joined: Oct 2009 Alan, the black paint beneath the cross brace was the 'primer' as the brace was supplied to the assembly line. Obviously there'd be no reason to paint underneath it. Like you, I have seen the same thing. deuce_roadster 02-11-2011 @ 11:21 PM reply profile send p.m. Member Posts: 284 Joined: Oct 2009 By the way, the grille I am putting together from NOS parts is that red oxide looking primer Ford used, all the pieces are red. The standard grille parts that I also have were black. All these parts came with a coupe I bought a few years ago that has been in a garage since 1957 and the guy had been hoarding NOS parts since then but never finished the car before he died. kubes40 02-12-2011 @ 6:02 AM reply profile send p.m. Senior Posts: 3394 Joined: Oct 2009 NOS parts are often service replacement parts and as such may very well have been made differently than the factory (destined to assembly line) pieces.

<< previous || next >>

PAGE: 1 2

NOTE: YOU MUST BE A REGISTERED USER AND BE LOGGED IN TO POST (and reply to) messages in this forum. If you are a first time user, please click the CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT in the masthead above to register and Log In. After that, all you do is LOG IN to enjoy using this site.

DISCLAIMER: The V-8 Club does no independent testing of any of the opinions, thoughts or suggestions presented in the website on the Forum, in the Tech Tips section, or any section. A reader should consider the website to be a forum wherein differing solutions to a particular set of circumstances may be discussed. Ultimately, the selection of an item for an individual's vehicle must be based upon the independent study of the vehicle owner in consultation with people in the hobby and restoration experts.

EFV-8 Club Forum Home | Back to Home Page | Contact the Webmaster

Copyright © 2009 - EFV-8.org
Powered by < CF FORUM > v.2.1