fortyford | -- 12-20-2020 @ 5:39 PM |
What were all the stock rear end ratios that came in the 40?I thought the 3.78 was pretty much the stock one?Am I correct on this?
|
|
kubes40 | -- 12-20-2020 @ 6:02 PM |
The 3:78 was by far the most common in the 85HP cars. The 95HP cars got a lot of them as well although some were fitted with a 3:54. A 4:11 was also available. The 60HP cars for the most part got the 4:44. Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
|
fortyford | -- 12-20-2020 @ 6:40 PM |
Thanks,Kube.I guess a 3.54 would be hard to come by?
|
|
kubes40 | -- 12-21-2020 @ 6:06 AM |
They are reproduced. I do not know if they are quality or not. Finding the real McCoy is a bit challenging. Mercury's often had them but to install in your ZFord requires a bit of modification. Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
|
JayChicago | -- 12-21-2020 @ 9:36 AM |
One bloke's opinion, for what it's worth: Changing to a 3:54 would gain some top-end speed, but sacrifice some low-speed acceleration. And do you really need to drive your car faster? I remember reading a post from Kube in response to someone wanting an overdrive to keep up with modern highway traffic. Went something like this: "I can see driving our cars at 70-75 MPH, but I can't see being able to stop or steer safely at that speed." After reading that, I decided to just be happy driving the Interstate in the right lane at 50-55 MPH. I'm not in a hurry to get where I'm going; I'm doing what I love doing, driving my old car. As the traffic flies past, I wave back at people ogling the car and flashing thumbs up. No hurry to end the fun. This message was edited by JayChicago on 12-21-20 @ 9:47 AM
|
|
kubes40 | -- 12-21-2020 @ 9:39 AM |
I'll still hold strong in that opinion ![]() Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
|
37RAGTOPMAN | -- 12-21-2020 @ 3:44 PM |
I believe the rear end ratios depended were the car was sold, I installed a 354-1 in my 37, and LOVE IT, no problems driving it anywhere, even on hills bought it from the EARLY FORD PARTS, they advertise in the V8 TIMES, hope this helps, 37Ragtoman
|
|
kubes40 | -- 12-21-2020 @ 5:07 PM |
37rag, Where did you gather this information from? Quote: ("I believe the rear end ratios depended were the car was sold") Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
|
37RAGTOPMAN | -- 12-22-2020 @ 3:42 PM |
Kubes40 if you lived in the hills like VERMONT, NEW HAMPSHIRE, etc I would think you would have a 411 rear end ratio, to climb hills, or if you lived in TEXAS, or flat lands, you would most likely have a 354 ratio, if not,,, why did FORD and others have several ratios ? as FORD EXAMPLE, had 354,378 411, why I ask my self that they supply these ? it is a head scratcher for sure my 2 cents 37Ragtopman
|
|
40 Coupe | -- 12-31-2020 @ 7:11 AM |
The June 36 Ford Service Bulletin p 382 indicates: the 4.33 are used on passenger and commercial cars in mountainous territories the 3.78 ratio as standard , the 3.54 as optional, the 4.11 is the old standard until the 3:78 was adopted. The Dec. 29, 1939 Ford Service Bulletin subject No. S-4000 p 1 indicates the Standard ratio of 3.78 and optional ratios of 3.54 and 4.11 for the 85HP vehicles of 1937-1940. The 60HP ratio of 4.44 except for commercial vehicles.
|
|
kubes40 | -- 01-02-2021 @ 12:07 PM |
40coupe, Thanks for the references. What you had substantiated re 1940 is what I had found in other places. Your bulletin was one I had never come upon. Thanks again. Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
|
EFV-8 Club Forum : | https://www.earlyfordv8.org/forum |
Topic: | https://www.earlyfordv8.org/forum/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=14&Topic=14434 |